Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands

16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1969A Ladder Of Citizen Participation17,032 cited
1973Dilemmas in a general theory of planning16,321 cited
1999Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups3,358 cited
2002The Third Wave of Science Studies2,095 cited
1982Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science1,954 cited
1985Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion.1,848 cited
2006Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics988 cited
1986GROUP APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIALECTICAL INQUIRY, DEVIL'S ADVOCACY, AND CONSENSUS.683 cited
1961Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.639 cited
2008Discursive Representation603 cited
1999Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology580 cited
2001What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public550 cited
1935CORRELATING PERSONS INSTEAD OF TESTS475 cited
1982Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions -- Theory, Cases and Techniques422 cited
1995Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

344 cited

1993Reconstructive Democratic Theory337 cited

Cited by

2015Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems311 cited
2011Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods222 cited
2016Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives184 cited
2020Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review177 cited
2011Q methodology: an overview169 cited
2016Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology162 cited
2014Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology150 cited
2016Bridging the Gap between Social Acceptance and Ethical Acceptability133 cited
2014Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems100 cited
2014Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States87 cited
2013Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology86 cited
2012Northern Visions? Applying Q methodology to understand stakeholder views on the environmental and resource dimensions of sustainability82 cited
2016Mapping discourses using Q methodology in Matang Mangrove Forest, Malaysia75 cited
2014Overly ambitious critics and the Medici Effect: a reply to Kampen and Tamás66 cited
2013Diverging viewpoints on tiger conservation: A Q-method study and survey of conservation professionals in India61 cited
2013Q‐ING FOR HEALTH—A NEW APPROACH TO ELICITING THE PUBLIC'S VIEWS ON HEALTH CARE RESOURCE ALLOCATION52 cited