Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology

4 references·13 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
2001Randomized, controlled trials in surgery201 cited

Cited by

2008Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact43 cited
2018Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: Review of adherence to the CONSORT statement39 cited
2010Reporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic review37 cited
2018The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery32 cited
2014Recent Randomized Controlled Trials in Otolaryngology25 cited
2010The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestockand Food Safety21 cited
2009Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products18 cited
2010The REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety16 cited
2014A systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials in head and neck oncology surgery

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited

2001Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals.15 cited

2023The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes13 cited

2020The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis13 cited

2021Reporting quality of surgical randomised controlled trials in head and neck cancer: a systematic review12 cited