SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleFragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews

Matthew Holek2020

Article2020

Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews

Matthew Holek · Faris Bdair · Mohammed Inam Ullah Khan · Michael W. Walsh · Philip James Devereaux · Stephen D. Walter +2 more

20 citations·0/0 files stored·Contemporary Clinical Trials

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2014Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range 2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature 2016The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey 2019The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses 2018The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review 2017Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials 2018The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2021The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Reviewreview · 4 shared references 2023Predictors of Increased Fragility Index Scores in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: An Umbrella Reviewreview · 4 shared references 2021The Fragility Index of Hip Arthroscopy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Surveyreview · 3 shared references 2021The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Patellofemoral Instability Research: A Systematic Reviewreview · 3 shared references 2021The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Gynaecologic Surgery: A Systematic Reviewreview · 3 shared references 2019Fragility index: how fragile is the data that support the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of Crohn’s disease?article · 3 shared references

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-09-14

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials

ISSN-L1551-7144

Languageen

Citations20

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.cct.2020.106151

openalex_workW3084796809

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.