SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews
8 references·0 citing·38 second hopsampled
Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews (2020)Fragility of clinical trials across resea…The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)The statistical significance …The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review (2018)The Fragility of Statisticall…The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery (2018)The fragility of statisticall…Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)Fragility of Results in Ophth…The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)The Fragility of Statisticall…Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Estimating the sample mean an…A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature (2013)A systematic scoping review o…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range (2016)Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Statistical Fragility and the Role of P Values in the Sports Medicine Literature (2018)The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Fragility Index of Hip Arthroscopy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Survey (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review (2021)Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Fragility index: how fragile is the data that support the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of Crohn’s disease? (2019)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Gynaecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review (2021)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Patellofemoral Instability Research: A Systematic Review (2021)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study (2013)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Beyond Decoding: A Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Language Comprehension Interventions on K–5 Students’ Language and Literacy Outcomes (2020)Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2014Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range11,685 cited
  • 2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
  • 2016The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey171 cited
  • 2019The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses121 cited
  • 2018The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review72 cited
  • 2017Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials53 cited
  • 2018The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery32 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work