SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Group Discussion and Examinee Performance Information on Judgments Made in the Angoff Standard-Setting Procedure
10 references·0 citing·35 second hop
An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Group Discussion and Examinee Performance Information on Judgments Made in the Angoff Standard-Setting Procedure (2008)An Empirical Examination of the Impact of…Educational measurement. (2015)Educational measurement.Conclusions About Frequently Studied Modified Angoff Standard-Setting Topics (2004)Conclusions About Frequently …Generalizability Theory (2001)Generalizability TheoryRelations Between Observed Item Difficulty Levels and Angoff Minimum Passing Levels for a Group of Borderline Examinees (1999)Relations Between Observed It…Teachers' Ability to Estimate Item Difficulty: A Test of the Assumptions in the Angoff Standard Setting Method (1998)Teachers' Ability to Estimate…Validating the Performance Standards Associated With Passing Scores (1994)Validating the Performance St…Influence of Type of Judge, Normative Information, and Discussion on Standards Recommended for the National Teacher Examinations (1990)Influence of Type of Judge, N…Differential Use of Item Information by Judges Using Angoff and Nedeisky Procedures (1988)Differential Use of Item Info…The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. (1974)The Dependability of Behavior…The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles (1974)The Dependability of Behavior…Essentials of educational measurement (1973)Essentials of Educational Measurement (1980)Standard Setting: An Alternative Approach (1997)Academic self‐concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student (2010)A review on the accuracy of teacher judgments (2020)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of assessments: A review and a study into the ability and accuracy of estimating the difficulty levels of assessment items (2006)LINKING ENGLISH‐LANGUAGE TEST SCORES ONTO THE COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE: AN APPLICATION OF STANDARD‐SETTING METHODOLOGY (2008)Judges' Use of Examinee Performance Data in an Angoff Standard‐Setting Exercise for a Medical Licensing Examination: An Experimental Study (2009)The standards for educational and psychological testing. (2013)The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice (1994)Validating score interpretations and uses (2011)Validity evidence based on test content (2014)The educational researcher (2021)Estimation of the Reliability of Ratings (1951)Educational Measurement (1952)A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced Tests (1986)How Many Raters Should be Used for Establishing Cutoff Scores with the Angoff Method? a Generalizability Theory Study (1999)Insights into the Angoff method: results from a simulation study (2016)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)The Reproducibility of Standards Over Groups and Occasions (1992)Distractor Similarity and Item-Stem Structure: Effects on Item Difficulty (2007)Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations (1976)Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (1996)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data (2003)Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers (2012)An Introduction to Network Psychometrics: Relating Ising Network Models to Item Response Theory Models (2017)A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably? (2006)Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress (2009)COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020)Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient (1988)A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Educational measurement.2,272 cited
  • 1974The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles1,819 cited
  • 2001Generalizability Theory1,121 cited
  • 1974The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles.598 cited
  • 1994Validating the Performance Standards Associated With Passing Scores288 cited
  • 1998Teachers' Ability to Estimate Item Difficulty: A Test of the Assumptions in the Angoff Standard Setting Method172 cited
  • 2004Conclusions About Frequently Studied Modified Angoff Standard-Setting Topics73 cited
  • 1990Influence of Type of Judge, Normative Information, and Discussion on Standards Recommended for the National Teacher Examinations66 cited
  • 1999Relations Between Observed Item Difficulty Levels and Angoff Minimum Passing Levels for a Group of Borderline Examinees44 cited
  • 1988Differential Use of Item Information by Judges Using Angoff and Nedeisky Procedures41 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work