Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Complexity of Public Attitudes Toward Compact Development

11 references·16 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Party Identification and Core Political Values640 cited
2001Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism432 cited
2005Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It354 cited
2004The Extent and Determinants of Dissonance between Actual and Preferred Residential Neighborhood Type200 cited
2006Reasons for Living in a Transit-Oriented Development, and Associated Transit Use173 cited
2003Legalizing Smart Growth125 cited
2005A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives125 cited
2006Transportation and land-use preferences and residents’ neighborhood choices: the sufficiency of compact development in the Atlanta region122 cited
2008Is Support for Traditionally Designed Communities Growing? Evidence From Two National Surveys104 cited
2004Policy Support for and Barriers to Transit-Oriented Development in the Inner City: Literature Review103 cited
2005The Results of Making a City More Compact: Neighbours' Interpretation of Urban Infill95 cited

Cited by

2012Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate314 cited
2016Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation269 cited
2011Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

258 cited

2016Amenity, accessibility and housing values in metropolitan USA: A study of Salt Lake County, Utah142 cited

2014Partisan sorting in the United States, 1972–2012: New evidence from a dynamic analysis136 cited

2018Reassessing NIMBY: The demographics, politics, and geography of opposition to high-density residential infill56 cited

2014Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism55 cited

2017Is the suburban dream still alive in Australia? Evidence from Brisbane50 cited

2016Nudging NIMBY: Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences?48 cited

2020Is the perceived neighborhood built environment associated with domain-specific physical activity in Latin American adults? An eight-country observational study47 cited

2014Desire for Smart Growth: A Survey of Residential Preferences in the Salt Lake Region of Utah45 cited

2011Assessing the social and environmental achievements of New Urbanism: evidence from Portland, Oregon45 cited

2016Residents’ preferences for walkable neighbourhoods38 cited

2020Identifying latent demand for transit-oriented development neighbourhoods: Evidence from a mid-sized urban area in Canada31 cited

2018Cohousing For Whom? Survey Evidence to Support the Diffusion of Socially and Spatially Integrated Housing in the United States29 cited

2016Shaping urban consolidation debates: Social representations in Brisbane newspaper media24 cited