SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Estudios de precisión diagnóstica (STARD) y pronóstica (REMARK)
13 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Estudios de precisión diagnóstica (STARD) y pronóstica (REMARK) (2005)Estudios de precisión diagnóstica (STARD)…Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (2005)Reporting Recommendations for…Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2005)Quality of Reporting of Diagn…Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Sources of Variation and Bias…Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Towards complete and accurate…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future (2003)Reporting of prognostic marke…Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study (2003)Assessment of the accuracy of…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Use of methodological standar…A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. (1986)A framework for clinical eval…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy (1995)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary (2008)Summed score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was a reliable and valid method for depression screening in chronically ill elderly patients (2008)How to critically appraise an article (2009)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (2005)REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2006)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (2002)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2,148 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.862 cited
  • 2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy800 cited
  • 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
  • 2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study312 cited
  • 1986A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.195 cited
  • 2003Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future166 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies138 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.