Explaining ESL essay holistic scores: A multilevel modeling approach

Khaled Barkaoui

70 citations0/0 files storedLanguage Testing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Student Assessment and Feedback

Abstract

This study adopted a multilevel modeling (MLM) approach to examine the contribution of rater and essay factors to variability in ESL essay holistic scores. Previous research aiming to explain variability in essay holistic scores has focused on either rater or essay factors. The few studies that have examined the contribution of more than one factor to variability in essay scores relied on analytic techniques that do not reflect the nested structure of essay ratings. One goal for this article is to illustrate the use and potential contributions of MLM to research on essay score variability. The study included 31 experienced and 29 novice raters who each rated a set of essays holistically and analytically. Scores were analyzed using MLM to examine the associations between essay features and holistic scores and the impact of rater experience on both essay holistic scores and these associations. The experienced raters assigned lower scores and gave more importance to linguistic accuracy than did the novices. Novices gave more importance to argumentation and their scores exhibited more variability. The article concludes by highlighting the value of MLM in identifying and estimating the contributions of various individual, textual and contextual factors in the rating context to variability in ESL essay scores.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Assessing Writing 1998Using FACETS to model rater training effects 2002Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: what do they really mean to the raters?2000Using Computer-Tagged Linguistic Features to Describe L2 Writing Differences 1990Expertise in evaluating second language compositions 2008Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability 2002Decision Making while Rating ESL/EFL Writing Tasks: A Descriptive Framework 1994Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions

Cited by

2017A systematic review of methods for evaluating rating quality in language assessment 2011Structural Equation Modeling in Language Testing and Learning Research: A Review 2012Comparing holistic and analytic scoring methods: issues of validity and reliability 2015Features of difficult-to-score essays 2017Empirical Learner Language and the Levels of theCommon European Framework of Reference 2014

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.