Activity Budget and Positional Behavior of the Mysore Slender Loris (Loris tardigradus lydekkerianus) : Implications for Slow Climbing Locomotion

K. A. I. Nekaris

179 citations0/0 files storedFolia Primatologica

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Primate Behavior and Ecology Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Abstract

Both predator defense and feeding ecology models have been proposed to explain the relatively slow climbing locomotion of the Lorisinae. During a study of the socioecology of the Mysore slender loris (Loris tardigradus lydekkerianus) in Tamil Nadu, India, six categories of behavior and eleven different postures were recorded to estimate a general activity budget for the slender loris, and are examined here particularly in relation to slow climbing locomotor strategies. Reactions to potential predators are also described. The main study population was composed of 15 animals. Activity budgets were compiled in three ways: all instantaneous point samples collected over 1,173 h pooled (n = 13,717), the means of individual lorises (n = 15) and behavior at the moment of first contact (n = 357). No significant difference was found between these three data sets. Approximately 45% of the activity budget was spent in inactive behaviors including sitting vigilant, resting and sleeping. Foraging and traveling comprised nearly half the activity budget, with the rest of the time spent grooming. The most common postures assumed by lorises were sitting and quadrupedal walking. Individual lorises were relatively gregarious and spent up to half their activity budget with other animals. Unlike pottos and angwantibos, lorises did not freeze, head butt or drop from branches in reaction to potential predators, but either ignored them, fled or made loud calls. Cryptic and slow climbing locomotion were used before traveling on open ground between discontinuous substrates, thereby supporting hypotheses relating to predator pressure, and also before capturing fast moving insect prey, supporting hypotheses relating to diet. It is proposed that a divergence in foraging strategies between bushbabies and lorisines may be the best adaptive explanation for their behavioral and morphological differences, including predator defense mechanisms.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 179 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods 1953Primates : comparative anatomy and taxonomy 1990Primate origins: Lessons from a neotropical marsupial 1993A Review of Predation on Lemurs: Implications for the Evolution of Social Behavior in Small, Nocturnal Primates

Cited by

2006A Re-Evaluation of the Role of Vision in the Activity and Communication of Nocturnal Primates 2014Extreme primates: Ecology and evolution of Asian lorises 2003Observations of Mating, Birthing and Parental Behaviour in Three Subspecies of Slender Loris (Loris tardigradus and Loris lydekkerianus ) in India and Sri Lanka 2003Diet and Feeding Behavior of Mysore Slender Lorises 2012Hiding from the Moonlight: Luminosity and Temperature Affect Activity of Asian Nocturnal Primates in a Highly Seasonal Forest 2013Primate Ecology and Conservation 2005Foraging behaviour of the slender loris (Loris lydekkerianus lydekkerianus): implications for theories of primate origins 2009Exudativory in the Bengal slow loris (Nycticebus bengalensis) in Trishna Wildlife Sanctuary, Tripura, northeast India

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.