A COMPARISON OF VALIDATION CRITERIA: OBJECTIVE VERSUS SUBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND SELF‐ VERSUS SUPERVISOR RATINGS

Calvin C. Hoffman · Barry R. Nathan · LISA M. HOLDEN

122 citations0/0 files storedPersonnel Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cognitive Abilities and Testing Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Employer Branding and e-HRM

Abstract

This study compared four criteria–two objective (production quantity and production quality) and two subjective (supervisor and self‐ratings)–for their predictability in a criterion‐related validity study. Results from this sample of 212 maintenance, mechanic, and field service workers replicated previous meta‐analytic results with clerical workers (Nathan & Alexander, 1988); supervisor ratings and objective productivity indices provided similar and significant validity coefficients with a unit‐weighted composite of five cognitive ability tests. The objective quality index and employee self‐ratings resulted in near zero correlations with the same predictor battery. Additional productivity and quality objective criterion data were available for 2 years since the original validation study; no change in validity was found.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 122 citations exist upstream.

References

1988A META‐ANALYSIS OF SELF‐SUPERVISOR, SELF‐PEER, AND PEER‐SUPERVISOR RATINGS 1982Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis.1967Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox 1978Applied Psychology in Personnel Management 1984METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS 1972A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ).1980Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations.1973THE VALIDITY OF APTITUDE TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION

Cited by

2012Is it Just a Bad Class? Assessing the Long‐term Stability of Estimated Teacher Performance 2015When the dark ones become darker: How promotion focus moderates the effects of the dark triad on supervisor performance ratings 2020It is all about the bottom line: Group bottom‐line mentality, psychological safety, and group creativity 2001Degradation of validity over time: A test and extension of Ackerman's model.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.