Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Measuring Compactness and the Role of a Compactness Standard in a Test for Partisan and Racial Gerrymandering

3 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1993Harvard Civil Rights: Civil Liberties Law Review1,425 cited
2024Journal of Law and Politics288 cited
1962Urban Research Methods.51 cited

Cited by

2011ARTIFICIAL STATES202 cited
2013Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches152 cited
1990On Political Methodology105 cited
2004A Comparative Analysis of Redistricting Institutions in the United States, 2001-0285 cited
2015Districting Problems77 cited
2020Quantifying Gerrymandering in North Carolina72 cited
2000Assessing South Carolina's 1990s congressional districting68 cited
2016Toward a Talismanic Redistricting Tool: A Computational Method for Identifying Extreme Redistricting Plans66 cited
2011Measuring the Compactness of Political Districting Plans65 cited
2011BARD: Better Automated Redistricting62 cited
1999Electoral Systems and the Representation of Minority Interests in Legislatures62 cited
2021How to Measure Legislative District Compactness If You Only Know It When You See It62 cited
2021Imposing Contiguity Constraints in Political Districting Models

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

60 cited

2018Quantifying Gerrymandering Using the Vote Distribution60 cited

2013How well do supranational regional grouping schemes fit international business research models?59 cited

2010A Measure of Bizarreness58 cited