Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Glacial Pace of Scientific Publishing: Why It Hurts Everyone and What We Can Do To Fix It

3 references·9 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?97 cited
2002Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication75 cited
2011End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments50 cited

Cited by

2019A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 201732 cited
2019The high resource impact of reformatting requirements for scientific papers24 cited
2016Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal13 cited
2020Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey13 cited
2017Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives11 cited
2017Publication Delay of Korean Medical Journals11 cited
2017It Is Time to Re‐Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research10 cited
2022Publication delays and associated factors in ophthalmology journals9 cited
2013A year in the life of eLife5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work