A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF ESTABLISHING CUT‐OFF SCORES ON CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTS

Abstract

Journal of Educational MeasurementVolume 20, Issue 3 p. 283-292 A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF ESTABLISHING CUT-OFF SCORES ON CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTS CRAIG N. MILLS, Corresponding Author CRAIG N. MILLS Louisiana Department of EducationCRAIG N. MILLS, Administrative Officer, Bureau of Accountability, Louisiana Dept. of Education, P.O. Box 44064, Baton Rouge, LA 70804. Degrees: BS, Purdue University; MA, West Virginia College of Graduate Studies; EdD, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Specializations: Psychometric theory.Search for more papers by this author CRAIG N. MILLS, Corresponding Author CRAIG N. MILLS Louisiana Department of EducationCRAIG N. MILLS, Administrative Officer, Bureau of Accountability, Louisiana Dept. of Education, P.O. Box 44064, Baton Rouge, LA 70804. Degrees: BS, Purdue University; MA, West Virginia College of Graduate Studies; EdD, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Specializations: Psychometric theory.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1983 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00206.xCitations: 18 The author would like to express his appreciation to Stephen Kottler, Daniel Sheehan, and Samuel Livingston for their comments and advice on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Appreciation is also expressed to the JEM reviewers for their comments. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume20, Issue3September 1983Pages 283-292 RelatedInformation

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.