SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The JAAD adopts the CONSORT statement
4 references·1 citing·21 second hop
The JAAD adopts the CONSORT statement (1999)The JAAD adopts the CONSORT statementImproving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…An Evaluation of Method Reporting and Use in Clinical Trials in Dermatology (1985)An Evaluation of Method Repor…Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Reporting on Methods in Clini…How to Critically Appraise a Randomized Controlled Trial (2008)How to Critically Appraise a …Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Assessing Reports of Therapeutic Trials (1970)An evaluation of the quality of therapeutic studies in perinatal medicine (1983)The Cochrane Skin Group (1998)How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)Cars, CONSORT 2010, and Clinical Practice (2010)Guidelines for reporting clinical trials (1974)Problems of omission in communications (1979)Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials (1980)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials510 cited
  • 1985An Evaluation of Method Reporting and Use in Clinical Trials in Dermatology35 cited

Cited by

  • 2008How to Critically Appraise a Randomized Controlled Trial6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work