SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Expert reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses
9 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Expert reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2002)Expert reviews, systematic reviews and me…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …The Cochrane Collaboration in the 20th Century (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration in…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy (1998)Towards evidence based radiat…The Promise and Problems of Meta-Analysis (1997)The Promise and Problems of M…Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information? (1997)Do authors of review articles…Meta-analysis in clinical trials reporting: Has a tool become a weapon? (1992)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…THE APPLICATION OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS CONCEPTS IN SUMMARIZING THE FINDINGS OF OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES (2007)THE APPLICATION OF SYSTEMATIC…Cochrane's legacy (1992)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Meta-analysis and structured literature review in radiology1 (2005)Evidenzbasierte Medizin und systematische Übersichtsarbeiten (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Understanding and Evaluating a Meta‐analysis (1994)Criticisms of Meta‐Analysis (2009)Systematic Reviews in Health Research (2022)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico (2005)Randomized controlled trials in health technology assessment: Overkill or overdue? (2008)COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING OF RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING, DOSE, AND DELIVERY IN VETERINARY RADIATION ONCOLOGY MANUSCRIPTS FROM 2005 TO 2010 (2011)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine (1998)5. Reading journals and monitoring the published work (2000)The Need for Systematic Reviews in Oncology (2018)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Ideal Fertility in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2019)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Affective Disorders and Suicide Risk: A Reexamination (2000)Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (2006)A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. (2012)Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field (2005)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary (2008)Music for Pain and Anxiety in Children Undergoing Medical Procedures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2008)A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1997The Promise and Problems of Meta-Analysis403 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care254 cited
  • 1998Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy148 cited
  • 1992Meta-analysis in clinical trials reporting: Has a tool become a weapon?39 cited
  • 1997Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information?30 cited
  • 2001The Cochrane Collaboration in the 20th Century20 cited

Cited by

  • 2007THE APPLICATION OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS CONCEPTS IN SUMMARIZING THE FINDINGS OF OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work