SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal · Study

ReviewReporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal

Mei Chun Chung2009

OA

Reviewbronze2009

Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal

Mei Chun Chung · Ethan M. Balk · Stanley Ip · Gowri Raman · Winifred W Yu · Thomas A Trikalinos +2 more

45 citations·0/0 files stored·American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?1995Empirical Evidence of Bias 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Cited by

2014Use and Applications of Systematic Reviews in Public Health Nutrition 2021NUQUEST—NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies 2013Empirical evaluation of meta‐analytic approaches for nutrient and health outcome dose‐response data

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?review · 6 shared references 2013Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Home Telemonitoring Interventions for Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Critical Assessment of Their Methodological Qualityreview · 6 shared references 2013Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journalsarticle · 6 shared references 2008The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatryarticle · 6 shared references 2008Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientistreview · 6 shared references 2013An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)review · 6 shared references

Details

Year2009

Typereview

Published2009-02-26

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition

ISSN-L0002-9165

Languageen

Citations45

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.3945/ajcn.2008.26821

openalex_workW2149344544

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.