References

• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
• 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies2,698 cited
• 2006The case of the misleading funnel plot1,759 cited
• 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited
• 2006Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement606 cited
• 2003Registering Clinical Trials