Communicating statistical DNA evidence

Samuel C. Lindsey · Ralph Hertwig · Gerd Gigerenzer

55 citations0/0 files storedMPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Legal processes and jurisprudence Statistics Education and Methodologies

Abstract

There is a growing need to present statistical scientific evidence in a form that judges and jurors can understand and eva1uate.After examining statistica1 issues surrounding forensie DNA evidence, this article presents research that demonstrates a way to improve judges' and jurors' understanding of evidence involving probabilities and statistics.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 55 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony 2020Psychological Aspects of Forensic Identification Evidence 2013The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility 2013The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions 2014The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of DNA analysis 2021Toward a common language for quality issues in forensic science 2016Differential reporting of mixed DNA profiles and its impact on jurists’ evaluation of evidence. An international analysis 2020What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.