References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
• 2020Psychological Aspects of Forensic Identification Evidence33 cited
• 2013The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility32 cited
• 2013The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions28 cited
• 2014The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of DNA analysis23 cited
• 2021Toward a common language for quality issues in forensic science16 cited
• 2020What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses11 cited
• 2016Differential reporting of mixed DNA profiles and its impact on jurists’ evaluation of evidence. An international analysis11 cited
• 2020Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities10 cited
• 2018Clear communication through clear purpose: understanding statistical statements made by forensic scientists10 cited
• 2019Calculating the posterior odds from a single-match DNA database search9 cited
• 2023Measuring people’s covariational reasoning in Bayesian situations7 cited
• 2011Bayesian Updating in the EEG - Differentiation between Automatic and Controlled Processes of Human Economic Decision Making