SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticlePercentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)

Loet Leydesdorff A2012

Article2012

Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)

Loet Leydesdorff A · Lutz Bornmann

30 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Library Science and Information Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

1992The skewness of science 2012The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 2011Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications 2011Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing 2011Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator

Cited by

2024R&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: a combined effect framework 2012Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them 2012An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis 2014The Substantive and Practical Significance of Citation Impact Differences Between Institutions: Guidelines for the Analysis of Percentiles Using Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals 2019How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators 2019Comparison of the Impact Factors of the Most-Cited Cardiovascular Journals

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2012Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papersarticle · 4 shared references 2013Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100)article · 4 shared references 2012The Citation Merit of Scientific Publicationsarticle · 4 shared references 2012An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysisarticle · 4 shared references 2013The “academic trace” of the performance matrix: A mathematical synthesis of the h‐index and the integrated impact indicator (I3)article · 4 shared references 2012An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevancearticle · 4 shared references

Details

Year2012

Typearticle

Published2012-04-10

VenueJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

ISSN-L1532-2882

Languageen

Citations30

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1002/asi.22641

openalex_workW2149800516

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2012

The citation-based indicator and combined impact indicator—New options for measuring impact

2021Total number of papers and in a single percentile fully describes research impact—Revisiting concepts and applications