SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)
5 references·8 citing·45 second hop
Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) (2012)Percentile ranks and the integrated impac…The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)The new Excellence Indicator …Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)Which cities produce more exc…Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications (2011)Integrated impact indicators …Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator (2011)Basic properties of both perc…The skewness of science (1992)The skewness of scienceR&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: a combined effect framework (2024)R&D team network configuratio…Total number of papers and in a single percentile fully describes research impact—Revisiting concepts and applications (2021)Total number of papers and in…How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators (2019)How well does I3 perform for …Comparison of the Impact Factors of the Most-Cited Cardiovascular Journals (2019)Comparison of the Impact Fact…The Substantive and Practical Significance of Citation Impact Differences Between Institutions: Guidelines for the Analysis of Percentiles Using Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals (2014)The Substantive and Practical…The citation-based indicator and combined impact indicator—New options for measuring impact (2012)The citation-based indicator …Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012)Inconsistencies of recently p…An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis (2012)An evaluation of impacts in “…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis (2011)Conceptual difficulties in the use of statistical inference in citation analysis (2016)La producción de tesis doctorales en España (1995-2014): evolución, disciplinas, principales actores y comparación con la producción científica en WoS y Scopus (2017)The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor (2019)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary? (2015)Scientometrics (2015)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 (1998)The inconsistency of the h‐index (2011)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)How much do different ways of calculating percentiles influence the derived performance indicators? A case study (2013)The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes (1920)A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society (2007)The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations (2013)Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) (2013)Are circular economy strategies economically successful? Evidence from a longitudinal panel (2023)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers (2012)Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject Headings of P ub M ed (2012)Strategic Intelligence on Emerging Technologies: Scientometric Overlay Mapping (2015)Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events (1989)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations? (2012)Impact of Journals and Academic Reputations of Authors: A Structured Bibliometric Survey of the IEEE Publication Galaxy (2013)Exploring the intellectual structure of nanoscience and nanotechnology: journal citation network analysis (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)On the calculation of percentile‐based bibliometric indicators (2012)Citation impact prediction for scientific papers using stepwise regression analysis (2014)The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations (2017)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)ASEAN Library and Information Science (LIS) research (2018–2022): a bibliometric analysis with strategies for enhanced global impact (2023)SOCIAL CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION: THE ROLE OF INTRAFIRM NETWORKS. (1998)Structural Holes and Good Ideas (2004)Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation (2005)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 2012The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011179 cited
  • 2011Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications163 cited
  • 2011Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing85 cited
  • 2011Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator58 cited

Cited by

  • 2024R&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: a combined effect framework29 cited
  • 2012Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them25 cited
  • 2012An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis23 cited
  • 2014The Substantive and Practical Significance of Citation Impact Differences Between Institutions: Guidelines for the Analysis of Percentiles Using Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals22 cited
  • 2019How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators13 cited
  • 2019Comparison of the Impact Factors of the Most-Cited Cardiovascular Journals12 cited
  • 2012The citation-based indicator and combined impact indicator—New options for measuring impact9 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Total number of papers and in a single percentile fully describes research impact—Revisiting concepts and applications
8 cited