SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Registering systematic reviews
4 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Registering systematic reviews (2009)Registering systematic reviewsEpidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study (2006)Compliance with QUOROM and qu…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…Publishing Protocols of Systematic Reviews (2002)Publishing Protocols of Syste…The international platform of registered systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY) at 3 years: an analysis of 4,658 registered protocols on inplasy.com, platform features, and website statistics (2023)The international platform of…The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols (2022)The score after 10 years of r…The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework (2021)The rationale behind systemat…Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews (2020)Toolkit of methodological res…Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study (2020)Methodological quality of sys…Mapping the characteristics of network meta-analyses on drug therapy: A systematic review (2018)Mapping the characteristics o…Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? (2017)Do systematic reviews on pedi…How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3) (2016)How to prepare a systematic r…Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias (2013)Systematic reviews supporting…The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties (2012)The scatter of research: cros…The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (2012)The quality of research synth…Summary of Findings Tables: Presenting the Main Findings of Cochrane Complementary and Alternative Medicine-related Reviews in a Transparent and Simple Tabular Format (2012)Summary of Findings Tables: P…The Evidence Base for Interventions Delivered to Children in Primary Care: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2011)The Evidence Base for Interve…Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Scientific Rationale and Interpretation (2011)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation (2011)Establishing a Minimum Datase…Reporting a Systematic Review (2010)Reporting a Systematic Review"Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford (1985)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Recent Randomized Controlled Trials in Otolaryngology (2014)A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension (2016)Systematic Reviews and Clinical Trials in Rehabilitation: Comprehensive Analyses of Publication Trends (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Decoding intentions from movement kinematics (2016)Sleep Disturbances in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature (2011)The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2011)Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update (2018)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses (2012)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)The CONSORT statement (2019)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Standardizing effect size from linear regression models with log-transformed variables for meta-analysis (2017)Social media and eating disorder psychopathology: A systematic review (2021)How to perform meta-analysis in R: a simple yet comprehensive guide (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3) (2016)Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review (2020)Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews With Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Outcomes: An ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report (2021)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The efficiency of machine learning-assisted platform for article screening in systematic reviews in orthopaedics (2022)Comparative Analysis of Systematic, Scoping, Umbrella, and Narrative Reviews in Clinical Research: Critical Considerations and Future Directions (2025)Large Language Model–Assisted Risk-of-Bias Assessment in Randomized Controlled Trials Using the Revised Risk-of-Bias Tool: Evaluation Study (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews (2023)Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process (2023)Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica (2023)Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process (2010)Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO (2012)GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • 2002Publishing Protocols of Systematic Reviews188 cited
  • 2006Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study149 cited

Cited by

  • 2016How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3)220 cited
  • 2011Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation96 cited
  • 2011Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Scientific Rationale and Interpretation71 cited
  • 2022The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols63 cited
  • 2021The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework56 cited
  • 2012The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties51 cited
  • 2012Summary of Findings Tables: Presenting the Main Findings of Cochrane Complementary and Alternative Medicine-related Reviews in a Transparent and Simple Tabular Format41 cited
  • 2023The international platform of registered systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY) at 3 years: an analysis of 4,658 registered protocols on inplasy.com, platform features, and website statistics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

37 cited
  • 2010Reporting a Systematic Review35 cited
  • 2020Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study31 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias26 cited
  • 2018Mapping the characteristics of network meta-analyses on drug therapy: A systematic review24 cited
  • 2017Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?20 cited
  • 2020Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews19 cited
  • 2012The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer19 cited
  • 2011The Evidence Base for Interventions Delivered to Children in Primary Care: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews18 cited