SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodologic standards in surgical trials
5 references·16 citing·42 second hop
Methodologic standards in surgical trials (1996)Methodologic standards in surgical trialsPublication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer. (1986)A quality assessment of rando…Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Reporting on Methods in Clini…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Meta-analytic comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies of breast cancer surgery (2012)Meta-analytic comparison of r…Do Surgical Trials Meet the Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials? (2012)Do Surgical Trials Meet the S…Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer—methods of clinical research in surgery (2011)Surgical evaluation and knowl…Trends in the Quality of Highly Cited Surgical Research Over the Past 20 Years (2008)Trends in the Quality of High…Evaluating the Evidence: Statistical Methods in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urological Literature (2008)Evaluating the Evidence: Stat…Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting (2006)Randomised clinical trials in…Treating Individuals 1 - External validity of randomised controlled trials: "To whom do the results of this trial apply?"' (2005)Treating Individuals 1 - Exte…Evolution of methodological standards in surgical trials (2005)Evolution of methodological s…Randomized Trials of Neurosurgical Interventions: A Systematic Appraisal (2004)Randomized Trials of Neurosur…Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standard (2003)Critical analysis of clinical…Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998 (2003)Clinical trials in orthodonti…Randomization in surgical trials (2002)Randomization in surgical tri…Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals (2001)Methodology standards associa…Clinical trials in general surgical journals: Are methods better reported? (1999)Clinical trials in general su…Surgery on trial: an account of clinical trials evaluating operations. (1998)Surgery on trial: an account …Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery (1997)Analysis of randomized contro…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (1983)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery (2013)A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials (2016)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)¿Cuál es la calidad metodológica de los artículos sobre procedimientos terapéuticos publicados en Cirugía Española? (2006)Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications (2008)Classification and appraisal of the level of clinical evidence of publications from the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons for the past 10 years (2009)Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science (1990)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Reference Accuracy in the General Surgery Literature (2010)A Bibliometric Analysis on Top-Cited Articles in Pain Research (2013)Quality of reporting in surgical randomized clinical trials (2016)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia (2000)Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of therapeutic trial reports (2005)Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: Common pitfalls and how to avoid them (2014)Systematic mapping of checklists for assessing transferability (2019)Economic Analysis in Randomized Control Trials (1992)Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs (2004)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
  • 1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Trends in the Quality of Highly Cited Surgical Research Over the Past 20 Years61 cited
  • 1997Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery55 cited
  • 2005Treating Individuals 1 - External validity of randomised controlled trials: "To whom do the results of this trial apply?"'50 cited
  • 2003Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standard47 cited
  • 2006Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting46 cited
  • 2003Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 199845 cited
  • 2001Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals45 cited
  • 2004Randomized Trials of Neurosurgical Interventions: A Systematic Appraisal34 cited
  • 2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Do Surgical Trials Meet the Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials?
33 cited
  • 2008Evaluating the Evidence: Statistical Methods in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urological Literature32 cited
  • 1999Clinical trials in general surgical journals: Are methods better reported?32 cited
  • 2011Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer—methods of clinical research in surgery27 cited
  • 2012Meta-analytic comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies of breast cancer surgery21 cited
  • 2002Randomization in surgical trials21 cited
  • 2005Evolution of methodological standards in surgical trials19 cited
  • 1998Surgery on trial: an account of clinical trials evaluating operations.19 cited