The Difference between Participation and Power in Japanese Factories

Robert Mortimer Marsh

29 citations0/0 files storedIndustrial and Labor Relations Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Labor Movements and Unions Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies Global and Cross-Cultural Management

Abstract

This examination of data on 48 Japanese manufacturing plants in 1983 suggests that, contrary to the belief of many Western observers, systems of participative decision making in Japan have not led to workplace democracy. Although the firms in this study allow workers to present ideas and suggestions—which can then, at supervisors' discretion, be embodied in formal proposals and passed to successively higher levels of the corporate hierarchy, receiving amendment as required for consensus —they deny workers the authority to make decisions. In general, as has been found in similar studies in other countries, strategic, non-programmed, organization-wide decisions tend to be made at high levels, whereas authority to make routine, programmed, sub-unit and individual-level decisions is delegated to lower hierarchical levels.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

1974British factory-Japanese factory 1974British Factory--Japanese Factory.1989Strategies for Learning 1972Technology, Size, and Organization Structure 1976Organizational structure in its context : the Aston programme I 1992Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry

Cited by

2008The moderating effects of hierarchy and control systems on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance 1998The cross-cultural transfer of management practices: The case of Japanese human resource management practices in Singapore 1995The adoption of international best practices in a Western culture: East meets West 1996Corporatism and Cooperation among Japanese Labor 1994Managerial Perceptions of Labor‐Management Cooperation 2006Productivity Puzzles - should employee participation be an issue?2003Is Korean Enterprise Bargaining a Bona Fide Tool for Employee Representation?2008

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.