LETHAL MEANS RESTRICTION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: BELIEFS AND BEHAVIORS OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PROVIDERS

Marian E. Betz · Matthew Miller · Catherine W. Barber · Ashley F. Sullivan · Carlos A. Camargo · Edwin D. Boudreaux

92 citations0/0 files storedDepression and Anxiety

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Suicide and Self-Harm Studies Gun Ownership and Violence Research Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the beliefs and behaviors of emergency department (ED) providers related to preventing suicide by reducing suicidal patients' access to lethal methods (means restriction) and identify characteristics associated with asking patients about firearm access. METHODS: Physicians and nurses at eight EDs completed a confidential, voluntary survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 79% (n = 631); 57% of respondents were females and 49% were nurses. Less than half believed, "most" or "all" suicides are preventable. More nurses (67%) than physicians (44%) thought "most" or "all" firearm suicide decedents would have died by another method had a firearm been unavailable (P < .001). The proportion of providers who reported they "almost always" ask suicidal patients about firearm access varied across five patient scenarios: suicidal with firearm suicide plan (64%), suicidal with no suicide plan (22%), suicidal with nonfirearm plan (21%), suicidal in past month but not today (16%), and overdosed but no longer suicidal (9%). In multivariable logistic regression, physicians were more likely than nurses to "almost always" or "often" ask about a firearm across all five scenarios, as were older providers and those who believed their own provider type was responsible for assessing firearm access. CONCLUSIONS: Many ED providers are skeptical about the preventability of suicide and the effectiveness of means restriction, and most do not assess suicidal patients' firearm access except when a patient has a firearm suicide plan. These findings suggest the need for targeted staff education concerning means restriction for suicide prevention.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Suicide Prevention Strategies 1999Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Lifetime Suicide Attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey 2012Means restriction for suicide prevention 2003Attendance at the accident and emergency department in the year before suicide: Retrospective study 1999Suicide and Violence Prevention: Parent Education in the Emergency Department 2009Suicide screening in schools, primary care and emergency departments 2010Emergency department contact prior to suicide in mental health patients 2006Survey of California Emergency Departments About Practices for Management of Suicidal Patients and Resources Available for Their Care

Cited by

2017Counseling on Access to Lethal Means (CALM): An Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Means Restriction Training Program for Mental Health Providers 2017Frequency of lethal means assessment among emergency department patients with a positive suicide risk screen 2020Lethal Means Assessment and Counseling in the Emergency Department: Differences by Provider Type and Personal Home Firearms 2021Improving Pediatric Residents’ Screening for Access to Firearms in High-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.