Personality and reproductive success in a high-fertility human population

Alexandra Alvergne · Markus M. Jokela · Virpi Lummaa

181 citations0/0 files storedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior Animal Behavior and Reproduction Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

The existence of interindividual differences in personality traits poses a challenge to evolutionary thinking. Although research on the ultimate consequences of personality differences in nonhuman animals has recently undergone a surge of interest, our understanding of whether and how personality influences reproductive decisions in humans has remained limited and informed primarily by modern societies with low mortality-fertility schedules. Taking an evolutionary approach, we use data from a contemporary polygynous high-fertility human population living in rural Senegal to investigate whether personality dimensions are associated with key life-history traits in humans, i.e., quantity and quality of offspring. We show that personality dimensions predict reproductive success differently in men and women in such societies and, in women, are associated with a trade-off between offspring quantity and quality. In women, neuroticism positively predicts the number of children, both between and within polygynous families. Furthermore, within the low social class, offspring quality (i.e., child nutritional status) decreases with a woman's neuroticism, indicating a reproductive trade-off between offspring quantity and quality. Consistent with this, maximal fitness is achieved by women at an intermediate neuroticism level. In men, extraversion was found to be a strong predictor of high social class and polygyny, with extraverted men producing more offspring than their introverted counterparts. These results have implications for the consideration of alternative adaptive hypotheses in the current debate on the maintenance of personality differences and the role of individual factors in fertility patterns in contemporary humans.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 181 citations exist upstream.

References

1992An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications 2006The Handbook of evolutionary psychology 2000The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism 2008Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures.2006The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals.2007The evolutionary genetics of personality 2009The Origins and Evolution of Leadership 2008Development and Validation of an International English Big-Five Mini-Markers

Cited by

2015The evolutionary genetics of personality revisited 2020Rethinking the fast-slow continuum of individual differences 2011Reproductive Behavior and Personality Traits of the Five Factor Model 2011Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) as living fossils of hominoid personality and subjective well-being.2020The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology 2013Testing an Adaptationist Theory of Trait Covariation: Relative Bargaining Power as a Common Calibrator of an Interpersonal Syndrome

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.