SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Judging jury service: Results of the north Carolina administrative office of the courts juror survey*
9 references·4 citing·30 second hop
Judging jury service: Results of the north Carolina administrative office of the courts juror survey* (2001)Judging jury service: Results of the nort…Legal blame: How jurors think and talk about accidents. (2000)Legal blame: How jurors think…Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents (2000)Legal blame: how jurors think…Public Trust and Confidence in the Courts: What Public Opinion Surveys Mean to Judges (1999)Public Trust and Confidence i…Jury trial innovations (1997)Jury trial innovationsWhat Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors (1993)What Jurors Think: Expectatio…The American jury on trial: psychological perspectives (1989)The American jury on trial: p…Judging the Jury (1986)Judging the JuryJudging the jury (1986)Judging the juryPsychology of Law: Integrations and Applications (1983)Psychology of Law: Integratio…Procedural Justice and Relational Theory (2020)Procedural Justice and Relati…Summonsing Criminal Desistance: Convicted Felons' Perspectives on Jury Service (2017)Summonsing Criminal Desistanc…A Field Study of the Presumptively Biased: Is There Empirical Support for Excluding Convicted Felons from Jury Service? (2013)A Field Study of the Presumpt…Fostering juror comfort: Effects of an orientation videotape. (2005)Fostering juror comfort: Effe…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)New visual technologies in court: Directions for research. (2003)The Influence of Gruesome Verbal Evidence on Mock Juror Verdicts (2004)The effects of deliberations and religious identity on mock jurors’ verdicts (2011)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Taking Rights Seriously (1978)The construction of social reality (1995)Between Facts and Norms (1996)Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions (1996)Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? (2001)Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. (2002)Explaining attitudes towards the justice system in the UK and Europe (2008)Confidence in the criminal justice system (2009)Technology for Justice : How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform (2010)Local justice: how institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens (1992)Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: (1998)Random Selection in Politics (1999)Juror interpretations of ambiguous evidence: The need for cognition, presentation order, and persuasion. (1990)The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory. (1995)Explaining Gender Differences in Jurors' Reactions to Child Sexual Assault Cases (2014)Preferences for Juries Over Judges Across Racial and Ethnic Groups* (2008)Technology and note-taking in the classroom, boardroom, hospital room, and courtroom (2016)Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making (1989)Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review (2015)Who Is the Victim Anyway? The Effects of Bystander Victim Impact Statements on Mock Juror Sentencing Decisions (2004)Introduction to the Special Issue on Emotion in Legal Judgment and Decision Making. (2006)The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (2004)Discourse in the us Courtroom (2012)Linguistic Human Rights (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Judging the jury192 cited
  • 1986Judging the Jury170 cited
  • 1989The American jury on trial: psychological perspectives85 cited
  • 1997Jury trial innovations71 cited
  • 1983Psychology of Law: Integrations and Applications48 cited
  • 2000Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents45 cited
  • 1999Public Trust and Confidence in the Courts: What Public Opinion Surveys Mean to Judges40 cited
  • 2000Legal blame: How jurors think and talk about accidents.38 cited
  • 1993What Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors31 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Procedural Justice and Relational Theory26 cited
  • 2017Summonsing Criminal Desistance: Convicted Felons' Perspectives on Jury Service20 cited
  • 2013A Field Study of the Presumptively Biased: Is There Empirical Support for Excluding Convicted Felons from Jury Service?19 cited
  • 2005Fostering juror comfort: Effects of an orientation videotape.10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work