No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Most insurance premiums are only weakly linked to mileage, and have largely lump-sum characteristics.The probable result is too many accidents and too much driving from the standpoint of economic efficiency.This paper develops a model of the relationship between driving and accidents that formalizes Vickrey's [1968] central insights about the accident externalities of driving.We use it to estimate the driving, accident, and congestion reductions that could be expected from switching to other insurance pricing systems.Under a competitive system of per-mile premiums, in which insurance companies quote risk-classified per-mile rates, we estimate that the reduction in insured accident costs net of lost driving benefits would be $9.8 -$12.7 billion in the U.S., or $58-$75 per insured vehicle.When congestion reductions are considered, the net benefits rise to $15-$18 billion, exclusive of monitoring costs.The total benefits of per-mile premiums with a Pigouvian tax to account for accident externalities would be $19-$25 billion, or $111-$146 per insured vehicle, exclusive of monitoring costs.Accident externalities may go a long way toward explaining why most insurance companies have not switched to per-mile premiums despite these large potential social benefits.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.