Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer

Jean‐François Harvey

149 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Knowledge Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Knowledge Management and Sharing Generational Differences and Trends Innovative Education and Learning Practices

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide the systematic analysis of an innovative, intergenerational knowledge transfer strategy in a knowledge‐intensive organization. Design/methodology/approach The case study method was adopted to study the intergenerational knowledge transfer activities. A triangulated approach was employed in respect of the data collection, which included non‐participatory observation, focus groups, documentary analysis, and semi‐structured interviews. A pattern analysis of data account was undertaken. Findings Two models for intergenerational knowledge transfer are presented: the source‐recipient model and the model of mutual exchange. This research also shows how a context conducive to knowledge transfer was developed, and concludes that this context allowed both explicit and tacit knowledge to be transferred. Research limitations/implications Often ignored or underestimated this study highlights the need for motivation, inspiration, and empowerment in knowledge transfer. The main limitation of this study is the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications The two models for intergenerational knowledge transfer provide a rubric against which both old and new intergenerational knowledge transfer initiatives can be assessed to determine whether they are capable of encouraging the transfer of both explicit and tacit knowledge. Originality/value There is little empirical work on the design and implementation of strategies for managing organizational memory. The integrated models and empirical results of this study can serve as guides in that process.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 149 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1973The Strength of Weak Ties 1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1994Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 1985Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness 1999Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity 1998Communities of Practice 1991The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization

Cited by

2017Cross-Boundary Teaming for Innovation: Integrating Research on Teams and Knowledge in Organizations 2020Leveraging age diversity for organizational performance: An intellectual capital perspective.2015The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: content and text analyses 2019AGATEto Understanding “Older” Workers: Generation, Age, Tenure, Experience 2016Knowledge Retention From Older and Retiring Workers: What Do We Know, and Where Do We Go From Here?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.