SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand
4 references·8 citing·35 second hop
The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand (2015)The healthy food environment policy index…The impact of initiatives to limit the advertising of food and beverage products to children: a systematic review (2013)The impact of initiatives to …Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed G overnment H ealthy F ood E nvironment P olicy I ndex (2013)Monitoring and benchmarking g…INFORMAS ( I nternational N etwork for F ood and O besity/non‐communicable diseases R esearch, M onitoring and A ction S upport): overview and key principles (2013)INFORMAS ( I nternational N e…A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet‐related non‐communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework (2013)A food policy package for hea…Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction (2022)Implementing healthy food env…Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel’s assessment and priority recommendations (2020)Benchmarking food environment…The first INFORMAS national food environments and policies survey in New Zealand: A blueprint country profile for measuring progress on creating healthy food environments (2019)The first INFORMAS national f…Benchmarking the commitments related to population nutrition and obesity prevention of major food companies in New Zealand (2019)Benchmarking the commitments …Relative contributions of recommended food environment policies to improve population nutrition: results from a Delphi study with international food policy experts (2018)Relative contributions of rec…Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study (2018)Measuring and stimulating pro…Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations (2018)Extent of implementation of f…Appetite for health-related food taxes: New Zealand stakeholder views (2017)Appetite for health-related f…Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History (1986)Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History (1987)Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary (2012)Processed foods and the nutrition transition: evidence from A sia (2014)Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia (2016)Relationship between shifts in food system dynamics and acceleration of the global nutrition transition (2016)The Extent, Nature and Effects of Food Promotion to Children: A Review of the Evidence to December 2008 (2009)Global benchmarking of children's exposure to television advertising of unhealthy foods and beverages across 22 countries (2019)Governmental policies to reduce unhealthy food marketing to children (2019)Systematic review of the effect of policies to restrict the marketing of foods and non‐alcoholic beverages to which children are exposed (2022)The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (2009)Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (2012)Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries (2013)The food environment, its effects on dietary consumption, and potential for measurement within agriculture-nutrition interventions (2015)Mechanisms for addressing and managing the influence of corporations on public health policy, research and practice: a scoping review (2020)Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis (2011)Concepts and critical perspectives for food environment research: A global framework with implications for action in low- and middle-income countries (2018)Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review (2020)Social Research Methods (2013)Smart food policies for obesity prevention (2015)Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study (2016)Stakeholder views on taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages and its adoption in the Netherlands (2021)Acceptability of policies targeting dietary behaviours and physical activity: a systematic review of tools and outcomes (2022)Tracking global funding for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases (2012)Patchy progress on obesity prevention: emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking (2015)A narrative review of regulatory governance factors that shape food and nutrition policies (2021)In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax (2017)Identifying implementation gaps and priorities for the Singapore government to improve food environment policies: perspectives from a local expert panel (2020)Policy implementation and recommended actions to create healthy food environments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): a comparative analysis in South Asia (2024)Strengthening of accountability systems to create healthy food environments and reduce global obesity (2015)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Of markets and rights: Discourse in the 2008 and 2013 Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases (2016)Benchmarking the Nutrition-Related Policies and Commitments of Major Food Companies in Australia, 2018 (2020)Benchmarking the transparency, comprehensiveness and specificity of population nutrition commitments of major food companies in Malaysia (2020)How food companies use social media to influence policy debates: a framework of Australian ultra-processed food industry Twitter data (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013INFORMAS ( I nternational N etwork for F ood and O besity/non‐communicable diseases R esearch, M onitoring and A ction S upport): overview and key principles679 cited
  • 2013A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet‐related non‐communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework401 cited
  • 2013Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed G overnment H ealthy F ood E nvironment P olicy I ndex307 cited
  • 2013The impact of initiatives to limit the advertising of food and beverage products to children: a systematic review249 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Benchmarking the commitments related to population nutrition and obesity prevention of major food companies in New Zealand44 cited
  • 2018Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study31 cited
  • 2019The first INFORMAS national food environments and policies survey in New Zealand: A blueprint country profile for measuring progress on creating healthy food environments27 cited
  • 2017Appetite for health-related food taxes: New Zealand stakeholder views26 cited
  • 2020Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel’s assessment and priority recommendations25 cited
  • 2018Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations24 cited
  • 2022Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Relative contributions of recommended food environment policies to improve population nutrition: results from a Delphi study with international food policy experts19 cited