Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process

Abstract

Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called "value analysis". This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.