Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Clinical trials in general surgical journals: Are methods better reported?

8 references·6 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
1993Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved?138 cited
1996How to report randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement113 cited
1996Methodologic standards in surgical trials84 cited
1981Statistical Proof in Inconclusive 'Negative' Trials50 cited
2007Reporting Clinical Trials in General Surgical Journals49 cited

Cited by

2020An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery26 cited
2017Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trials25 cited
2007Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals20 cited
2004The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): Better Presentation of Surgical Trials in the Journal of Hand Surgery18 cited
2009Evaluating the Surgery Literature11 cited
2010The Registrar8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work