Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents

11 references·16 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1950I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE10,274 cited
1994We have never been modern9,294 cited
1980Minds, brains, and programs6,950 cited
2004Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950)6,119 cited
2004On the Morality of Artificial Agents1,216 cited
2005What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design1,059 cited
1993Moral imagination: implications of cognitive science for ethics739 cited
1993Moral Imagination608 cited
2008Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent?275 cited
1970Punishment: The Supposed Justifications.208 cited
2007Morality in a Technological World114 cited

Cited by

2011Can we trust robots?195 cited
2011Robots: ethical by design90 cited
2018Mind Perception of Robots Varies With Their Economic Versus Social Function86 cited
2020A Normative Approach to Artificial Moral Agency76 cited
2021Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-Making

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

75 cited

2019SHOULD WE TRUST ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?; pp. 499–52268 cited

2021Understanding responsibility in Responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context68 cited

2016The issue of moral consideration in robot ethics58 cited

2022Blame It on the AI? On the Moral Responsibility of Artificial Moral Advisors54 cited

2022Ethical concerns with replacing human relations with humanoid robots: an ubuntu perspective49 cited

2014Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies46 cited

2021Robot Responsibility and Moral Community33 cited

2023Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People’s Reactions to Algorithmic Harm30 cited

2021A neo-aristotelian perspective on the need for artificial moral agents (AMAs)25 cited

2017Ethical framework of assistive devices: review and reflection22 cited

2025Human trust in AI: a relationship beyond reliance16 cited