Trainee Preferences for Feedback and Evaluation in Clinical Supervision

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review both the empirical and conceptual literature concerning trainee preferences for feedback and evaluation in clinical supervision. This unique review is based upon several separate literatures including psychology, social work, counseling, speech pathology, business, and medical training. It will discuss the importance of feedback and evaluation, their effectiveness in producing change, related supervisee preferences, the characteristics of effective and ineffective feedback and evaluation, and a step-by-step plan for providing quality feedback. Finally, it will provide results from a pilot study conducted on these topics and suggest some areas for future research. It is hoped that this paper will be useful to supervision researchers, clinical supervisors and supervisees, and training directors alike.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.