Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?

10 references·16 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1966The Logic of Collective Action.11,364 cited
1967The Concept of Representation5,147 cited
1969The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin3,086 cited
1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
1969An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups825 cited
1990The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains.690 cited
1983The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America607 cited
1986Organized Interests and American Democracy. By Kay Lehman Schlozman and John T. Tierney. (New York: Harper & Row, 1986. Pp. xix + 448. $12.00, paper.)590 cited
1988Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court439 cited
1987Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970220 cited

Cited by

2012Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research241 cited
1992A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Confirmations189 cited
2007Networking vs. allying: the decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU186 cited
2003Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying Across Multiple Venues183 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2011Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics150 cited

1997The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods146 cited

1993Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court134 cited

2007Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court118 cited

2001“Haves” Versus “Have Nots” in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases112 cited

2013Quality Over Quantity: Amici Influence and Judicial Decision Making106 cited

1990Interest-Group Litigation in Federal District Court: Beyond the Political Disadvantage Theory104 cited

2010Lobbying and Influence91 cited

2010Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?81 cited

2012The evolution and formation of amicus curiae networks74 cited

2004Collective Action and the Mobilization of Institutions74 cited

2013Business as usual: interest group access and representation across policy-making venues73 cited