Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutionsJoris A. H. de Groot, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Johannes B. Reitsma, Anne WS Rutjes, Nandini Dendukuri, K.J.M. Janssen, Karel G.M. Moons2011-08-02articleBMJ104 citationsbronzeNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyReliability and Agreement in MeasurementAbstractThe above examples show that partial disease verification, and thus missing disease outcome status in some of the patients, isCitations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 104 citations exist upstream.References1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy2007Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional studyCited by2016Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies2022STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2013Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy in the Face of Multiple Reference Standards