SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Comparison of Authorship Policies at Top-Ranked Peer-Reviewed Biomedical Journals
6 references·4 citing·44 second hop
A Comparison of Authorship Policies at Top-Ranked Peer-Reviewed Biomedical Journals (2012)A Comparison of Authorship Policies at To…Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit (2010)Influences on Authorship Issu…Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences (2010)Credit where credit is due? R…Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Science journal editors’ view…The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines (2008)The Ethical Assignment of Aut…Plagiarism: Words and Ideas (2008)Plagiarism: Words and IdeasAuthorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions (2004)Authorship Criteria and Discl…Authorship decisions in ecology, evolution, organismal biology and natural resource management: who, why, and how (2019)Authorship decisions in ecolo…The finer points of writing and refereeing scientific articles (2016)The finer points of writing a…Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct (2014)Improving biomedical journals…Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it (2013)Criticism of peer review and …When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship Fails (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Authorship and Characteristics of Articles in Pharmacy Journals: Changes Over a 20-Year Interval (2011)Addressing Authorship Issues Prospectively: A Heuristic Approach (2016)Hostage authorship and the problem of dirty hands (2018)In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons (2003)Ethics and scientific publication (2005)A tale of two citations (2008)Investigating Chinese University Students’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Plagiarism From an Integrated Perspective (2011)Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism (2014)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Biological invasions as global environmental change (1996)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship (2014)All for one or one for all? Authorship and the cross-sectoral valuation of credit in nutrition science (2017)THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE:: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (2017)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Declaración de trasparencia: promoviendo una publicación más completa, honesta y adecuada de los artículos cientítificos (2014)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates (1988)Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review (2015)Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers (2017)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Repairing research integrity (2008)Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review (2010)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)A practical guide to publishing a quality improvement paper (2021)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)A new framework for assessing the contributions of professionals in the natural sciences (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions199 cited
  • 2009Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey155 cited
  • 2008Plagiarism: Words and Ideas132 cited
  • 2010Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences100 cited
  • 2008The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines73 cited
  • 2010Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit29 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct15 cited
  • 2013Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it10 cited
  • 2019Authorship decisions in ecology, evolution, organismal biology and natural resource management: who, why, and how8 cited
  • 2016The finer points of writing and refereeing scientific articles5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work