Environmental disclosure by companies involved in initial public offerings

Martin Freedman · A. J. Stagliano

58 citations0/0 files storedAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting and Financial Management

Abstract

This paper is concerned with financial statement disclosure of environmental liabilities by companies that are coming to the US securities market for the first time in an initial public offering (IPO). This specific disclosure type has not been previously reported on in the accounting literature. Compares 26 IPO firms identified as potentially responsible parties (PRPs) in Superfund sites with a closely matched (on the attributes of industry classification and asset size) group of publicly held PRPs. The objective is to observe whether there is a differentially higher level of environmental disclosure by the IPO group during the year of heightened securities market scrutiny as the IPO occurs. Data are collected through content analysis of annual reports and SEC Form 10‐Ks. The results from this study show that no different level of environmental disclosure was identified in the matched‐pair sample. The more intense inspection, the higher stakes in an IPO situation and the enhanced due diligence procedures are of no apparent consequence in simulating a greater amount or quality of environmental disclosure. Strict disclosure mandates and expected public scrutiny do not appear to ensure the anticipated level of accounting statement disclosure concerning environmental liabilities.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 58 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory 1996Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?1982An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports 1990Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis 1992Accounting and environmentalism: An exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability 1997Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure 1991Falling down the Hole in the Middle of the Road: Political Quietism in Corporate Social Reporting 1995CORPORATE EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES (NON-) DISCLOSURE

Cited by

2003Why do South African companies not report more environmental information when managers are so positive about this kind of reporting?2010Recent developments in social and environmental accounting research 2022The impact of the UK's Modern Slavery Act (2015) on the disclosure of FTSE 100 companies 2006Environmental Disclosures in the Oil and Gas Industry 2014

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.