Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Norwegian Parties and Web 2.0

14 references·16 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony28,271 cited
2004The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields25,805 cited
1958An Economic Theory of Democracy.18,594 cited
1997Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy15,265 cited
1995Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy3,142 cited
1964Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State2,109 cited
2004The Network Society1,146 cited
1990Political Parties: Organization and Power. By Angelo Panebianco. Translated by Marc Silver. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 360p. $54.50 cloth, $16.95 paper.1,031 cited
1994An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change973 cited
2003Species of Political Parties533 cited
2004Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint445 cited
2003Preaching to the Converted?389 cited
2009Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain218 cited
2007The potential disruptive impact of Internet2 based technologies61 cited

Cited by

2014The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

105 cited

2014Triumph of the Underdogs? Comparing Twitter Use by Political Actors During Two Norwegian Election Campaigns82 cited

2016Friend or Foe? Digital Technologies and the Changing Nature of Party Membership80 cited

2015Weapon of the weak? The social media landscape of interest groups80 cited

2012Web 2.0 applications in government web sites80 cited

2014Pandering, protesting, engaging. Norwegian party leaders on Facebook during the 2013 ‘Short campaign'71 cited

2015Equalization versus Normalization: Facebook and the 2013 Israeli Elections67 cited

2012“Rejected Bits of Program Code”: Why Notions of “Politics 2.0” Remain (Mostly) Unfulfilled62 cited

2017“Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections60 cited

2015Online Campaigning by Austrian Political Candidates: Determinants of Using Personal Websites, Facebook, and Twitter59 cited

2012Obama's Online Success and European Party Organizations: Adoption and Adaptation of U.S. Online Practices in the Norwegian Labor Party58 cited

2014Poland’s 2011 Online Election Campaign: New Tools, New Professionalism, New Ways to Win Votes52 cited

2016Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning49 cited

2016Stuck with ‘electronic brochures’? How boundary management strategies shape politicians’ social media use46 cited

2014Is Web 2.0 Providing a Voice for Outsiders? A Comparison of Personal Web Site and Social Media Use by Candidates at the 2010 UK General Election37 cited

2010The Sidetracked 2008 YouTube Senate Campaign37 cited