The interpretation of overt and null pronouns in non-native Spanish

Cristóbal Lozano

50 citations0/0 files storedInstitutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Language Development and Disorders Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies

Abstract

At advanced levels of proficiency L2 learners can achieve native-like competence (e.g., Kanno, 1997; Pérez-Leroux & Glass, 1997, 1999). However, other studies report that learners only achieve near-native competence and show representational deficits despite long immersion in the L2 (Hawkins, 2000; Sorace, 1993). Interestingly, these claims derive from different types of property within Universal Grammar (UG). The former studies focus on universal principles, whereas the latter investigate properties which UG allows to vary (within limits) and attribute lack of native-like competence to L1 influence on the L2. An interesting question is whether this is the expected pattern in SLA: that advanced L2 speakers will always show native-like competence where principles are involved, but persistently fossilise on language-specific differences. In this study a principle and a language-specific property in the acquisition of non-native Spanish are considered. In particular, I investigate two pronominal constraints: the Overt Pronoun Constraint (OPC) (Montalbetti, 1984, 1986) and the Contrastive Focus Constraint (CFC). An experiment was designed to compare sensitivity to both constructions in advanced learners of Spanish (Greek natives and English natives). Results suggest that both non-native groups ’ behaviour towards OPC constructions is not different from Spanish native speakers, whereas only English natives differ from Spanish natives in CFC constructions. If the OPC is a principle of UG, as has been claimed, this supports the prediction that advanced learners can achieve native-like competence on properties which differ from the L1 but derive from universal principles of grammar design. By contrast, the problems which English, but not Greek, speakers have with the CFC support the claim that language-specific properties are potential targets for fossilisation. 1.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References

1993Lectures on Government and Binding 2014The Minimalist Program 1997The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’2000The new comparative syntax . Ed. by Liliane Haegeman. London & New York: Longman, 1997. Pp. 294.1998Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state 1998Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. By Wayne Cowart. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1997. Pp. xii, 187. Paper $17.95.1989Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition 1993Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian

Cited by

2012Cognitive approaches to L3 acquisition 2003UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR AND FOCUS CONSTRAINTS: THE ACQUISITION OF PRONOUNS AND WORD ORDER IN NON-NATIVE SPANISH 2016Pragmatic principles in anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface 2015The relationship between L3 transfer and structural similarity across development 2009The L2 Acquisition of Null and Overt Spanish Subject Pronouns: A Pragmatic Approach

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.