SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interobserver variability of C lavien– D indo scoring in urology
4 references·0 citing·12 second hop
Interobserver variability of C lavien– D indo scoring in urology (2014)Interobserver variability of C lavien– D …Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012 (2013)Use of Clavien-Dindo Classifi…Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations (2011)Reporting and Grading of Comp…Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature (2002)Quality of Complication Repor…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change (2007)The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications is Not a Statistically Reliable System for Grading Morbidity in Pediatric Urology (2015)Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel (2017)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2008)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Quality Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy Complications Reporting Using EAU Standardised Quality Criteria (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2002Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature620 cited
  • 2011Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations586 cited
  • 2013Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012136 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work