SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleStandards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change

S. Machele Donat2007

Article2007

Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change

S. Machele Donat

205 citations·0/0 files stored·Urology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Writing and Publishing Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 205 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature

Cited by

2011Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations 2013Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012 2014Quality Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy Complications Reporting Using EAU Standardised Quality Criteria 2018Reporting Adverse Events in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials 2016Reporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: A systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendationsarticle · 1 shared reference 2008AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Programreview · 1 shared reference 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harmsreview · 1 shared reference 2013Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012article · 1 shared reference 2004Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trialsreview · 1 shared reference 2003Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standardarticle · 1 shared reference

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-02-01

VenueUrology

ISSN-L0090-4295

Languageen

Citations205

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.056

openalex_workW2161010159

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.