SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change
1 references·5 citing·12 second hop
Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change (2007)Standards for Surgical Complication Repor…Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature (2002)Quality of Complication Repor…Reporting Adverse Events in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2018)Reporting Adverse Events in P…Reporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: A systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients (2016)Reporting adverse events in c…Quality Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy Complications Reporting Using EAU Standardised Quality Criteria (2014)Quality Assessment of Partial…Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012 (2013)Use of Clavien-Dindo Classifi…Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations (2011)Reporting and Grading of Comp…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms (2005)AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2008)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2008)A Systematic Review of Safety Reporting in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials: Challenges and Recommendations (2021)Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study (2022)Interobserver variability of C lavien– D indo scoring in urology (2014)The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications is Not a Statistically Reliable System for Grading Morbidity in Pediatric Urology (2015)Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature620 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations586 cited
  • 2013Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012136 cited
  • 2014Quality Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy Complications Reporting Using EAU Standardised Quality Criteria23 cited
  • 2018Reporting Adverse Events in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials15 cited
  • 2016Reporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: A systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work