Income inequality and health: the role of population size, inequality threshold, period effects and lag effects

Naoki Kondo · Rob M. van Dam · Grace N. Sembajwe · S. V. Subramanian · Ichiro I. Kawachi · Zentaro Yamagata

121 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Employment and Welfare Studies Public Health and Social Inequalities

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Income inequality has been associated with worse health outcomes in several but not all studies. The heterogeneity across studies may be explained by the variations in the size of area or population over which income inequality was evaluated. Moreover, the studies above a certain inequality threshold, conducted more recently, and incorporating a time lag may have stronger associations between income inequality and health. The authors investigated if the strength of the association between income inequality and health was altered by these factors. METHODS: The authors conducted a multivariate meta-regression analysis using nine multilevel cohort studies on income inequality and mortality and 14 multilevel cross-sectional studies on income inequality and self-rated health. RESULTS: Among cross-sectional studies, studies evaluating country-level inequality (average population>24 million) were more likely to show a stronger association between income inequality and poor health compared with those evaluating income inequality within small average populations (<820 000). There were no significant differences in the effect size of inequality-health association relating to the differences in the population size within a country across which income inequality was evaluated in both cross-sectional and cohort studies. The authors found that the threshold effects, period effects and lag effects were independent of the population size. CONCLUSIONS: Income inequality at the country level may have stronger adverse contextual effects on health than inequality in smaller areas, perhaps by best reflecting social stratification in a society. Furthermore, we found that threshold, period and lag effects were independent of area unit for evaluating inequality, which may have important policy implications.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 121 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting 1954The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments 2005Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence 1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies 2004Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review 2008Social Capital and Health 2004Income Inequality and Health: What Have We Learned So Far?

Cited by

2019Impact of Political Economy on Population Health: A Systematic Review of Reviews 2018The association between socioeconomic status and depression among older adults in Finland, Poland and Spain: A comparative cross-sectional study of distinct measures and pathways 2012Do people die from income inequality of a decade ago?2019Income inequality and firearm homicide in the US: a county-level cohort study 2019Income inequality and racial disparities in pregnancy-related mortality in the US

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.