Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

No evidence of bias in the process of publication of diagnostic accuracy studies in stroke submitted as abstracts

13 references·12 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
2000Publication and related biases.427 cited
1994Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis403 cited
1998Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting305 cited
1993NIH clinical trials and publication bias.293 cited
1999The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals.109 cited
2006Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials60 cited
2006Frequency and Determinants of Nonpublication of Research in the Stroke Literature54 cited
2002Association Between Time Interval to Publication and Statistical Significance51 cited

Cited by

2015Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited

2023Searching for and selecting studies29 cited

2012Handsearching did not yield additional unique FDG‐PET diagnostic test accuracy studies compared with electronic searches: a preliminary investigation28 cited

2014Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports27 cited

2016Thirty percent of abstracts presented at dental conferences are published in full: a systematic review25 cited

2020Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy23 cited

2016Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates20 cited

2018Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication19 cited

2015Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology18 cited

2016Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication17 cited

2019Publication Bias: Association of Diagnostic Accuracy in Radiology Conference Abstracts with Full-Text Publication16 cited

2019Publication bias may exist among prognostic accuracy studies of middle cerebral artery Doppler ultrasound12 cited