SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers
1 references·10 citing·44 second hop
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers (2006)Ten Simple Rules for ReviewersTen Simple Rules for Getting Published (2005)Ten Simple Rules for Getting …Scientific writing and publishing with IMRaD (2019)Scientific writing and publis…Desafios da editoração de revistas científicas brasileiras da área da saúde (2019)Desafios da editoração de rev…Critical review of a scientific manuscript: a practical guide for reviewers (2017)Critical review of a scientif…Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior (2016)Fortifying the Corrective Nat…Ten Simple Rules for Writing Research Papers (2014)Ten Simple Rules for Writing …Validity and reliability of the scientific review process in nursing journals – time for a rethink? (2013)Validity and reliability of t…To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript (2011)To publish or perish: How to …Peer Reviewing Interdisciplinary Papers (2010)Peer Reviewing Interdisciplin…Ten Simple Rules for Doing Your Best Research, According to Hamming (2007)Ten Simple Rules for Doing Yo…Peer Review in PLoS Medicine (2007)Peer Review in PLoS MedicineEffects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)How to review journal manuscripts: A lesson learnt from the world's excellent reviewers (2014)Scholarly peer reviewing′: The art, its joys and woes (2015)Métodos de pesquisa mistos e revisões de literatura mistas: conceitos, construção e critérios de avaliação (2017)The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks (2004)Ten Simple Rules for Effective Computational Research (2014)Ten Simple Rules for Reducing Overoptimistic Reporting in Methodological Computational Research (2015)Ten Simple Rules for a Good Poster Presentation (2007)Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations (2007)Ten simple rules for scientists: Improving your writing productivity (2018)Shift in the paradigm towards next-generation microbiology (2019)Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists (2022)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009)Scientometrics of Forest Health and Tree Diseases: An Overview (2016)Artificial Interdisciplinarity: Artificial Intelligence for Research on Complex Societal Problems (2020)Socio-oceanography: an opportunity to integrate marine social and natural sciences (2023)Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration (2007)On the Process of Becoming a Great Scientist (2008)The Impact Factor Game (2006)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Challenges to open peer review (2018)Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud? (2021)Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021 (2022)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey (2006)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Profissionalização da editoração de periódicos científicos: desafios da gestão de manuscritos na implantação do ScholarOne Manuscripts (2018)As publicações científicas como fonte de renda econômica de editores comerciais: o acesso aberto solapado (2022)Las revistas científicas-académicas y el proceso editorial hacia la ciencia abierta en Uruguay (2022)Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it (2011)World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice (2017)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Comparative Analysis of National and International Educational Science Articles in Vietnam: Evidence from the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion Structure (2020)Which structure of academic articles do referees pay more attention to?: perspective of peer review and full-text of academic articles (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published73 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior39 cited
  • 2019Desafios da editoração de revistas científicas brasileiras da área da saúde30 cited
  • 2014Ten Simple Rules for Writing Research Papers25 cited
  • 2010Peer Reviewing Interdisciplinary Papers23 cited
  • 2011To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript22 cited
  • 2007Ten Simple Rules for Doing Your Best Research, According to Hamming18 cited
  • 2019Scientific writing and publishing with IMRaD13 cited
  • 2017Critical review of a scientific manuscript: a practical guide for reviewers12 cited
  • 2013Validity and reliability of the scientific review process in nursing journals – time for a rethink?10 cited
  • 2007Peer Review in PLoS Medicine9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work