Effects of Faking Instructions on the Eysenck Personality Inventory

John R. Braun · Barbara J. Gomez

41 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Personality Traits and Psychology Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Effects of two faking instructions on Eysenck Personality Inventory scores were investigated. With both instructions, scores were significantly decreased on Neuroticism and significantly increased on Lie. The “attempt-to-conceal-faking” instruction produced significantly smaller increases in Lie but at the expense of a significantly smaller decrease in Neuroticism.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 41 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1986Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation 2007RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS 1999Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement 1982The good, the bad and the mad: Response bias in self-report measures 1993The dual nature of the Eysenckian neuroticism scales: A question of sex differences?1998Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores 1975Effects of Sophistication and Faking Sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory 1995Relationship between attributional style and Lie scores in an occupational sample motivated to fake good

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.