Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What does "unwilling" to impose the death penalty mean anyway? Another look at excludable jurors.

12 references·3 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1961EFFECTS OF GROUP PRESSURE UPON THE MODIFICATION AND DISTORTION OF JUDGMENTS2,637 cited
1952Groups, Leadership, and Men1,440 cited
1966Behavioral sciences and the law.1,075 cited
1971The American Jury551 cited
1967The American Jury.467 cited
1984The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation.188 cited
1984Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.176 cited
1971New Data on the Effect of a "Death Qualified" Jury on the Guilt Determination Process136 cited
1984On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death-qualification process.99 cited
1991To tell what we know or wait for Godot?60 cited
1987In the Supreme Court of the United States Lockhart v. McCree: Amicus curiae brief for the American Psychological Association.32 cited
1991Social science data and the APA: The Lockhart brief as a case in point.30 cited

Cited by

2009Aggravation and Mitigation: Findings and Implications22 cited
2007Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process17 cited
2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Victim impact statements and crime heinousness: a test of the saturation hypothesis

13 cited