Article2013

ATTENTION TO IRREGULAR VERBS BY BEGINNING LEARNERS OF GERMAN

65 citations0/0 files storedStudies in Second Language Acquisition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Second Language Acquisition and Learning EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Linguistic Education and Pedagogy

Abstract

This study focuses on beginning second language learners’ attention to irregular verb morphology, an area of grammar that many adults find difficult to acquire (e.g., DeKeyser, 2005; Larsen-Freeman, 2010). We measured beginning learners’ eye movements during sentence processing to investigate whether or not they actually attend to irregular verb features and, if so, whether the amount of attention that they pay to these features predicts their acquisition. On the assumption that attention facilitates learning (e.g., Gass, 1997; Robinson, 2003; Schmidt, 2001), we expected more attention (i.e., longer fixations or more frequent comparisons between verb forms) to lead to more learning of the irregular verbs. Forty beginning learners of German read 12 German sentence pairs with stem-changing verbs and 12 German sentence pairs with regular verbs while an Eyelink 1000 recorded their eye movements. The stem-changing verbs consisted of sixa→ächanging verbs and sixe→i(e)changing verbs. Each verb appeared in a baseline sentence in the first-person singular, which has no stem change, and a critical sentence in the second- or third-person singular, which have a stem change for the irregular but not the regular verbs, on the same screen. Productive pre- and posttests measured the effects of exposure on learning. Results indicate that learners looked longer overall at stem-changing verbs than regular verbs, revealing a late effect of verb irregularity on reading times. Longer total times had a modest, favorable effect on the subsequent production of the stem vowel. Finally, the production of only thea→äverbs—not thee→i(e)verbs—benefited from direct visual comparisons during reading, possibly because of the umlaut in the former. We interpret the results with reference to recent theory and research on attention, noticing, and language learning and provide a more nuanced and empirically based understanding of the noticing construct.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Research Methods in Education 1998Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.2001The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity 2003Working memory: looking back and looking forward 1990The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1 1989Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning 2005The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition 1980A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.

Cited by

2015First-generation students’ underperformance at university: the impact of the function of selection 2018Source use in the story continuation writing task 2015Effects of cognitive demands on attention orientation in L2 oral production 2015Investigating implicit and explicit processing using L2 learners’ eye-movement data 2020Exploring the depths of second language processing with eye tracking: An introduction

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.