Although vertical integration choices have been found to significantly affect firm performance, there has been little empirical study of how such choices are affected by the stage of industry evolution in which firms find themselves. We empirically investigate two possible impacts of increasing modularity on a firm's vertical integration choices. First, we hypothesize that increasing modularity is associated with vertical deintegration because of the high-level standardization of components that dominant designs tend to promote. Second, we posit that firms selling in higher market segments, because they are attempting to differentiate their products by incorporating unique components with less-modular interfaces with other components, will tend to be more vertically integrated than their lower-price rivals. We find evidence for both of these effects in data from the early U.S. auto industry.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 165 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.